Home/Reliability/Power System Studies
Power System Studies
Short-circuit, protective device coordination, arc flash, load flow, voltage drop, power factor, harmonic and grounding analysis — built on a model of your system as it is actually installed, not as the drawings claim.
The Problem
Two failure modes account for most of what goes wrong here. The first is the plant that has no studies at all — no fault duty calculation, no coordination review, no arc flash labels, and protective devices set to whatever they came from the factory with.
The second is more common and less obvious: the plant that has studies, done properly, seven years and two expansions ago. The utility has since replaced a transformer and the available fault current went up. A new substation was added. Three MCCs were relocated. The study on the shelf describes a system that no longer exists, and everybody treats it as current because it has a seal on it.
An out-of-date coordination study is not a neutral document. It actively misleads — it tells you the protection is selective when it is not, and it puts labels on equipment stating incident energy figures that no longer hold.
What Premier Does
We do the field work that makes the model correct, build and run the analysis, and interpret the results into recommendations a plant can act on.
The field verification is the part that determines whether a study is worth anything. Conductor lengths and sizes, actual device types and settings, transformer nameplate data and impedance, utility available fault current, and the connectivity as it is really wired — all confirmed rather than assumed. A study built from unverified drawings produces confident numbers that are wrong.
Professional engineering
Premier performs the field verification, system modelling and engineering analysis. Where a professional engineer’s seal is required, the study is reviewed and stamped by a licensed professional engineer. Sealed deliverables are arranged as part of the engagement.
Analysis
Study Types
Available fault current at each point in the system, compared against the interrupting and withstand ratings of the equipment installed there. The question it answers is whether your gear can actually clear what your system can deliver.
Time-current analysis across the protective devices in series, so a downstream fault opens the downstream device and not the main. Poor coordination is why a fault at one machine takes out half the plant.
Incident energy and boundary calculation per equipment location, producing the labelling and the PPE requirements — and, more usefully, identifying where settings changes could reduce the energy rather than just document it.
How power actually distributes through the system under real and projected loading. Where the constraints are, and what happens when the next line goes in.
Voltage at the load under running and starting conditions. The usual finding is a long feeder to a motor that has been marginal since the day it was installed.
Displacement and true power factor, the utility penalty being paid, and whether correction is worth installing — including the harmonic resonance risk of doing so.
Distortion sources, propagation and the effect on transformers, neutrals and sensitive equipment, evaluated against recognised limits and measured data.
Grounding and bonding arrangement reviewed against requirements and against the noise and reference problems it may be causing.
A maintained electrical model of the facility — the asset that makes every future study an update rather than a rebuild from zero.
Field-verified one-lines produced or corrected as part of the study, since the model requires them to be right anyway.
Process
How a Study Runs
Data Collection & Field Verification
Equipment nameplate data, conductor sizes and lengths, protective device types and as-found settings, transformer data, and utility available fault current. Verified in the field, because this step determines whether the rest of the study is real.
One-Line Development
Build or correct the one-line to reflect what is installed. Discrepancies found here are reported as findings in their own right — they usually matter beyond the study.
System Modelling
Model the system in analysis software, with sources, impedances, loading and protection represented as verified.
Analysis
Run the studies in scope and evaluate the results against equipment ratings and applicable criteria.
Recommendations
Setting changes, device replacements, equipment ratings issues and labelling requirements — with the practical trade-offs of each stated, including where a settings change buys more safety than a hardware change.
PE Review & Seal
Deliverables requiring a professional engineer’s seal are reviewed and stamped by a licensed professional engineer.
Implementation Support
Setting changes and device work coordinated with appropriately licensed electrical contractors, with labels produced and applied per the study results.
Keeping it current
A study is a snapshot of a system that keeps changing. Utility changes, expansions, new substations and equipment replacements all invalidate parts of it. Where a maintained model exists, updating a study after a plant change is a fraction of the cost of commissioning a new one — which is the argument for treating the model as an asset rather than as a project deliverable.
Related
Often Runs Alongside
Get the Study Built on Real Data.
Tell us the service size, the number of distribution buses in scope, and whether prior studies exist. We will scope the field verification and the analysis.